Where is the benefit for Louisiana citizens?
Last year the leges passed a pay raise for themselves. This year they passed an amendment to our constitution to change the vacation time for themselves.
The leges proposed a constitutional amendment that will move the starting date for the regular sessions up by two weeks. The voters get the final say in the fall of 2010.
According to the sponsor of the change to OUR constitution, Sen. Neil Riser, R-Columbia: “… [The purpose is] to allow lawmakers more time to spend summer vacations with families.” Times Picayune, June 26, 2009.
I see nothing in the amendment to benefit the public. In fact, those who are only able to take time off from work during the summers will have less of an opportunity to see what our (according to them) underpaid and inconvenienced public servants actually do.
There is nothing in the current constitution that prevents the leges from ending the sessions in time to spend summer vacations with families.
The leges should do everyone in Louisiana a favor by working at least five days a week, getting their work done quickly and adjourning the session early. No constitutional change is required and it will save us taxpayers money.
A constitutional convention will not prevent such frivolous amendments to the state constitution; defeating those who propose and vote for them will.
“Detrimental” cuts to Higher Ed?
For months there has been a tremendous amount weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth over the budgetary devastation to Higher Education in LA. Anyone who didn’t buy the sky-is-falling routine was told that they “didn’t understand.”
We were told that the only thing that could save Higher Ed from Third World status was a massive tax increase on the middle class working people of LA. The tax effort failed.
Friday, Public Affairs Research Council (”PAR”) released this post lege session comment on Higher Ed:
It remains to be seen how the budget cuts to higher education will be implemented and just how detrimental they will be to the state’s culture and economic promise.
Thursday, Bobby Jindal released this post-session comment on Higher Ed:
The finalized budget today represents a 6.98 percent reduction for higher education – not factoring in tuition. Factoring in tuition, this represents a 4.8 percent reduction for higher education. Factoring in all means of finance for higher education, this represents a 2.13 percent reduction for higher education and factoring in restricted items in higher education, this represents a 1.36 percent reduction for higher education.
If a reduction of less than 5% in the midst of a global depression/recession, is truly “detrimental” we have a serious management problem in Higher Ed.
When one factors in that there are fewer students, it may have been increase per capita in spending.
Next time, you are told by our public officials that it’s raining, first, make sure they aren’t peeing on your leg.
Subscribe Today and Save!!!
St. Charles Herald-Guide is an award-winning newspaper that covers all aspects of St. Charles Parish - from schools and parish government news to social events, features on our local residents and sports.
Order your subscription today!
Montz residents Pamela and Chris Valentine had only been married for four years...
Former Hahnville Volunteer Fire Department Chief Arthur Tregre has returned home...
The St. Charles Parish Housing Authority has been ordered to repay more than...
East Bank residents in the communities of Destrehan and New Sarpy will see a...
International-Matex Tank Terminals, which operates a terminal in St. Rose, will be...
Less than three months after opening a state-of-the-art cardiac catheter lab that...
Grand Ridge Golf Club’s eighteen holes wind through the Willowdale subdivision. Become a member or just come play a round of golf, check out our merchandise in the pro shop, and have some lunch and a beverage at the 19th Hole!
St. Charles Parish Housing authority ordered to repay $600K - 1614 views
The St. Charles Parish Housing Authority has been ordered to repay more than $600,000 because they did not verify the income of those receiving subsidized housing payments and allowed unsafe conditions to persist in Section 8 properties, according to a recent federal audit.