If the president does it, it's not illegal?

Special to the Herald-Guide
September 27, 2007 at 8:13 am  | Mobile Reader | Pring this storyPrint 

Since 9/11, George W. Bush has been trampling all over the Constitution. Unfazed by public opinion, the law or Congress, Bush seems to think he can get away with anything.

His most recent attempt (that we know of, at least) to expand his powers beyond all legal justification came in July 2007. Falling conveniently under the rubric of national security, Bush issued an executive order which authorizes the government to freeze the financial assets of anyone who directly or indirectly aids someone who has committed or “poses a significant risk of committing” violent acts “threatening the peace or stability of Iraq.”

Yet as Walter Pincus pointed out in the Washington Post, the text of the order, entitled “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq,” if interpreted broadly, “could cast a far bigger net to include not just those who commit violent acts or pose the risk of doing so in Iraq but also third parties—such as U.S. citizens in this country—who knowingly or unknowingly aid or encourage such people.”

In fact, the language is so broad that ordinary Americans who oppose the Iraq war could find their names on the list of persons who are perceived to be undermining “efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform” in Iraq. With public support for the war in Iraq plummeting, this could mean almost anyone.

This executive order is just the latest example of Bush’s surreptitious attempts through various presidential directives, executive orders and stealth provisions to lay claim to a host of unprecedented powers. For example, last fall, the Bush Administration engineered into a mammoth defense budget bill the insertion of two stealth provisions that authorize the president to use the military as a domestic police force in response to a natural disaster, disease outbreak, terrorist attack or any “other condition.” And another “presidential directive” issued in May 2007 allows Bush to assume control of the federal government following a “catastrophic event” such as an earthquake, hurricane or another 9/11.

Undaunted by plummeting approval ratings, George Bush just keeps moving forward. And our paper tiger Congress isn’t helping matters much, either. As Jonathan Alter noted in Newsweek, right before leaving for their summer recess, Congress “sold out the Constitution to cover their political rears while keeping the rest of us mostly in the dark.” Giving in to pressure from the White House, Congress passed the Protect America Act of 2007 (the title alone should be a warning that illicit motives are at work), which authorizes open-ended surveillance of Americans’ overseas phone calls and e-mails without the need for a warrant or security justification. It is, as Aziz Huq writes in The Nation, “power without responsibility.”

Which leaves us where, exactly? The groundwork has been laid, the documents signed and the powers transferred. For all intents and purposes, the Bill of Rights is as good as dead. All we await is the fall of the axe to signal that what has been plotted on paper is now a reality: the Bill of Rights will soon cease to afford us any protection from an imperial president.

View other articles written Special to the Herald-Guide

featured merchant

BENT'S RV Bent's RV is a Full Service RV Dealership in Louisiana.

Work to begin on new, larger $1M Norco Library
Work to begin on new, larger $1M Norco Library
Plans are underway to double the size of the Norco Library, an estimated $1 million project.

Become A Herald-Guide Insider

Get breaking news, sports and lifestyles straight to your inbox