An examination in state surplus

C.B. Forgotston
November 01, 2013 at 9:24 am  | Mobile Reader | Pring this storyPrint 

Recently, Team Jindal announced a potential (unconfirmed) $162.9 million surplus for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013.

Never failing to take credit for real or perceived good news (nor avoiding taking responsibility for bad news), Gov. Bobby Jindal was quick to pronounce that the surplus was due to “job growth.”

Before the leges plan how to spend the extra cash, it’s important to note that about this time last year the estimated surplus for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012 was $130 million. When the surplus was officially confirmed in January of this year, it had dropped to $113 million.

Overlooked in the reports of the potential surplus are two factors that obviously contributed to most, if not all of it. The $129 million mid-year (December 2012) budget cuts to higher education and healthcare and a tax increase in the form of $31 million tuition hike at the public colleges and universities.

As to Jindal’s claim that job growth is responsible for the surplus, it is just as logical to argue that the mid-year cuts and tuition increases were unnecessary.

It is also just as logical to conclude that the surplus was simply the result of inaccurate revenue estimates.

The bottom line is that there is no cause for any back-patting for this surplus.




View other articles written C.B. Forgotston

featured merchant

Saia Auto
Saia Auto At Saia Auto Consultants, our ultimate goal is to get you the highest quality vehicle for your money.

Luling native fighting  to find birth parents
Luling native fighting to find birth parents
- 889 views
Stacy Stabile-Forristal is a “search angel” who has helped numerous adoptees reconnect with their birth parents, but the path to her own reunion remains marked by disappointment, expense and vexing mystery.

Become A Herald-Guide Insider

Get breaking news, sports and lifestyles straight to your inbox